Ex-staffers now in government help Motorola land contracts

I do not know if you came here because you read it on social media, twitter, facebook, google +, stumble upon or anywhere else. thankyou for coming and I hope you enjoy reading this as much as I did.

As a Motorola saleswoman from 2004 to 2006, Laura Phillips coached local officials on how to secure state and federal grant money to pay for new public-safety radio equipment.

Later, Phillips used her knowledge in a much different way.

When she was put in charge of a government agency overseeing funding for emergency-communication projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, her office shepherded a federal grant that handed her former employer a $50 million deal to build the nation’s first regional high-speed broadband network for emergency responders.

The episode shines light on a reverse revolving door: Instead of leaving government for lobbying jobs, numerous Motorola workers have quit their private-sector jobs for government positions in which they’ve taken actions benefiting their former employer.

In Phillips’ case, critics claimed her office pursued the grant without the knowledge of some of the six affected major cities and counties, and that Motorola competitors got little shot at the deal. Phillips denied favoring Motorola.

Investigators for the Commerce Department’s inspector general’s office ultimately concluded that Phillips’ office rammed through a grant application that was rife with “significant misrepresentations,” including that a joint authority for 10 Bay Area counties existed a year before its first meeting.

Phillips wasn’t found to have engaged in misconduct, but the project is now dead.

In Anchorage, Tryg Erickson said he spent more than a quarter-century working as a Motorola salesman before leaving in 2005 to take a job as director of communications and electronics for Alaska’s biggest city.

Two years later, the city bought a $25 million 2 Way Radio system from Motorola without soliciting proposals. Instead, it adopted terms from a competitively bid contract that the state had awarded to the company in 1999, Erickson recalled.

The citywide public-safety system was a project, he said, that “everyone knew would go to Motorola.”

“My previous customer was my predecessor” in the city job, he said, “and that’s not as uncommon as it would seem. There’s pretty much Motorola and anybody else.”

If you are you looking for more on Kenwood radio review our own site.

Advantages of Wireless Lan

Without giving too much about this 2 way radio john lewis article, but I found it interesting and significant to what I’m currently doing.

Maybe you have considered getting an exciting wireless office? Would you believe it is difficult at this timeOr it’s not practical? In case your response to that real question is yes, you will want to see this short article for sure.

Let’s explore overturn situation first: What could often be the benefits of wired systems over wireless systems? Well, the immediate points that involves our mind may be the following:

Speed. Wireless systems are regarded as slow and getting a minimal bandwidth.

Real-time programs. Wireless systems cannot handle real-time programs like voice and video.

Security. The wireless signals achieve even over the road. Let’s say someone hacks directly into my network?

Incompatibility: Certain products like ink jet printers etc. aren’t Wi-Fi enabled. Laptop Computer doesn’t have Wi-Fi cards.

Let us take a look at each point individually on walkie talkies (I’m penning this article within the perspective of the enterprise/office network, and therefore I’m presuming the Wi-Fi network is made using Wireless Remotes, Access Points and Store)

Speed:

Wired systems were built with a decent speed of 100 Megabyte per second and nowadays possess a speed of 1000 Megabyte per second. Wireless systems have only a speed of 54 Megabyte per second which too is shared among many customers.

Produce one application which may take up 1000 Megabyte per second per port, as well as 100 Megabyte per second per port after which most likely I could accept the above mentioned statement. The truth is, even when your workplace runs demanding programs like multimedia, ERP, video etc, the utmost bandwidth requirement per user might not mix even 4 Megabyte per second! Now go ahead and take 54 Megabyte per second of Wi-Fi systems and think that 15 individuals are hooking up to it, each user could get around 2.5 Megabyte per second, that is sufficient for many from the programs that people have today, and when all of the 15 customers don’t connect simultaneously, just one user of a walkie talkie could easily get much more bandwidth. Actually, using the creation of 802.11n standard for Wi-Fi, the bandwidth available per entry way is about 300 Megabyte per second and can touch 600 Megabyte per second in the long run. So, even when 15 people interact with one 802.11n access point, they may get more than 20 Megabyte per second, that is a lot more than sufficient for the majority of the programs around the network today.

Real-time Programs:

Let’s say I run PC based interactive video during my company? Can the wireless systems handle real-time traffic?

A decent interactive video client might not take a lot more than 256-384 Killerbytes per second for giving 30 f/s quality video with H.264 compression. The number of such conferences are likely to happen concurrently? And real-time programs run perfectly in case your wireless controller supports WMM – Wireless Multi Media protocol which prioritize the actual time traffic within the normal traffic, and the majority of the remotes today support it. Even voice is supported around the wireless LAN – such as the seamless handover in one AP to a different, if you’re transporting the VoWLAN mobile phone models. There’s a fascinating technology that’s growing fast, which is known as FMC – Fixed Mobile Convergence where your IP Phones and Cell phones could be integrated having a single mobile phone and you’ve got one number for. Though IP Landline Phones aren’t based on Wireless Systems, such improvements (Like FMC and VoWLAN mobile phone models for voice-over wireless LAN) help include capabilities in addition to provide the fundamental service a lot more effectively.

Security

The wireless signals can penetrate the walls and actually go over the road – let’s say someone hacks my network?

This really is a legitimate concern. The safety is jeopardized in case your wireless communications aren’t encoded using the latest standards and proper security guidelines aren’t applied. But when the safety guidelines are applied based on the latest standards (like 802.11i etc), then your likelihood of smashing the network from outdoors is extremely less. Also, you will find Wireless Invasion prevention software’s that are offered within the market nowadays which keep checking for wireless risks and makes use of plus they inform as well as thwart tries to intrude directly into your wireless network instantly.

Incompatibility:

You will find certain products which are not Wi-Fi compatible – like certain ink jet printers, fax machines and copiers etc. But you’ll be amazed at the number of products are Wi-Fi compliant and also have in a commercial sense ready Wi-Fi based items already – Surveillance Cameras, Multi-Function Products, Access Control Card visitors, Laptops, Projectors and nearly every network based device includes a Wi-Fi compliant model. Even when certain items aren’t Wi-Fi compliant, cables might be attracted selectively for individuals programs alone, rather than wiring the entire office with three ports per cubicle! Actually, Wireless Access Points have to be linked to LAN cables behind finish, so a restricted quantity of wired switch ports is anyway needed. And you will find always USB based Wi-Fi adaptors that may be employed to create a pc (PC) wireless.

So, getting established that wired systems aren’t naturally better than current generation wireless systems, let’s now consider the additional advantages that wireless systems provide over wired systems :

Less Cost Saving with the amount of cables, switch ports needed but additionally in the price of passive components.

Comfort and Mobility – The wireless systems are available anywhere – even within the canteen and also the lawn. You just need a Wi-Fi enabled laptop to access them. And also the customers can connect with the network everywhere – working areas, conference rooms, grass etc.

Redundancy: If the Access Point fails, another neighbouring entry way can instantly connect the customers (without needing to alter the port connection by hand like in wired systems).

Network access control, AD integration: The centralized management functionality from the wired systems using Active Directory (or LDAP etc) can be obtained with the majority of the wireless systems today. Actually, controller based wireless systems can provide network access control – grouping the customers and determining which customers get access to which assets within the network (Restricting certain customers from being able to access the web, etc).

Load balancing: The access points can instantly push the customers to neighbouring access points if they’re overloaded. Some remotes even let it restrict the bandwidth that the single user/group can access within the LAN, to ensure that they don’t overload the network.

You will find a lot more, but when you would like to go over further on a single or on any particular subject, hop to our blog. There’s an entire category on wireless systems!